The Barbizon School of French Painters
19th Century French artists in search of beauty in rural life
In the middle of the 19th century, a group of French artists set up home in the village of Barbizon in the Fontainebleau forest, some forty miles southeast of Paris. They made paintings of landscape scenes and peasant agriculture, with especial attention given to naturalistic lighting effects. After the village that became their centre, they became known as the Barbizon School.
The beginnings of the Barbizon School can be traced back to the 1824 Salon de Paris in which the English painter John Constable exhibited three paintings and was praised by several prominent French artists of the time, including Théodore Géricault and Eugène Delacroix. He wrote of the reaction: “They are struck with [the paintings’] vivacity and freshness, things unknown to their own pictures.” The The Hay Wain became one of Constable’s most successful paintings and was singled out for a Salon gold medal and moved to a prominent place in the exhibition.
Constable was admired for his unique approach to making art, which turned away from the academic tradition of copying from old paintings and instead used direct studies of nature as his primary source. The originality of Constable’s technique would have a pronounced influence on the course of French art, most notably among the members of the Barbizon school.
As early as 1829, Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot came to Barbizon to paint in the Forest of Fontainebleau. Corot adopted an effective practice of travelling and painting outdoors during the summer months, making studies and sketches directly from nature, which he would then use as the basis for larger, more finished pieces during the winter.
Corot had begun his adult life as an apprentice to a draper (cloth retailer). Commercial life however, with its “business tricks”, didn’t agree with the young Corot, and at the age of 26 he persuaded his father to support a change of career. “I told my father that business and I were simply incompatible, and that I was getting a divorce.”
orot had begun what would become a commonplace practice among Parisian artists of the time, of travelling beyond the suburbs of the capital into the countryside. In the summer months, artists began to venture to the royal parks of Saint-Cloud and Versailles. Other artists went to the beach resorts on the Normandy coastline. Others still went to the rural environs of Barbizon in search of their own authentic experience. John Constable’s influence would be crucial in this regard as a guiding light.
During the 1840s in Paris, a several of the key members of the Barbizon School were beginning to befriend one another, including Jean-François Millet, Constant Troyon, Narcisse Diaz, Charles Jacque and Théodore Rousseau.
Several of these artists would experience disappointment at the hands of the Salon. Some failed to gain entry. Others, like Millet, were the recipients of severe criticism. In 1848 he exhibited his ambitious work The Captivity of the Jews in Babylon, but the painting was condemned by art critics and the public alike.
In June of the following year, he settled in Barbizon with his wife and their children. Here he focused more concertedly on the scenes of rural life instead of grand history paintings, and consequently discovered the mode of painting that suited him best. As he wrote in a letter to a friend:
But, to tell the truth, peasant-subjects suit my nature best, for I must confess, at the risk of your taking me to be a Socialist, that the human side is what touches me most in art, and that if I could only do what I like, or at least attempt to do it, I would paint nothing that was not the result of an impression directly received from Nature, whether in landscape or in figures. (Jean-François Millet, letter, 1850)
Millet’s painting The Gleaners, made in 1857, is a work that stands out as a paradigm for the Barbizon school. It’s temperate colour scheme, the late afternoon dusk setting, along with the feathery brushwork, give the work a harmonious feeling and draws on the romantic idealisation of the countryside as a place of simple and earnest community.
Millet had a strong conviction that the feeling of unity withing a painting was the key to its success. “Beauty is the result of harmony,” he wrote.
I do not know whether in art one thing is more beautiful than another. Which is most beautiful, a straight or a crooked tree? — the one that fits the situation best. In the right place, a hunchback will be more beautiful than Apollo himself. However one looks at it, however one turns it around, and whatever one chooses to call it, order will always carry the day. Order and harmony are the same thing. (Jean-François Millet, letter, 1858)
One of Millet’s best know works is The Angelus, painted between 1857–1859. The painting shows two peasants during the potato harvest in Barbizon, with a view of the church tower of Chailly-en-Bière. Millet said of the work: “The idea for The Angelus came to me because I remembered that my grandmother, hearing the church bell ringing while we were working in the fields, always made us stop work to say the Angelus prayer for the poor departed.”